Monday, April 6, 2009

Voting Result Updates For Batang Ai 7.4.2009

Sarawak Headhunter will attempt to bring the latest voting result updates for the N29 Batang Ai by-election from each counting station as soon as they are known, barring unforeseen circumstances such as communication or internet breakdown or blackout. Please refer to this post for all voting result updates or go to Lina Soo for live coverage and results.

So far as at 11 am, voter turnout at SK Lubok Antu 50+% and at SMK Lubok Antu 40+%.

12.15 pm, voter turnout at Sebangki 70%.

Final Unofficial Results/Voters' voting patterns for Batang Ai







N.29 Batang Ai (2009)









7th April 2009 By-Election N.29 Batang Ai







S/No
Polling District
Polling Station
Reg
Votes
PKR Jawah
BN Malcolm






Voters
Cast
Gerang
Mussen
1
Sebangki
SK Sebangki
479
351
103
248
2
Lubok Antu
SMK Lubok Antu 1
350
260
93
167




SMK Lubok Antu 2
366
224
98
126
3
Sekarok
SK Sekarok
356
261
86
175
4
Kesit
SK Ng Kesit
673
365
124
241




SK Ng Kesit


168
46
122
5
Engkari
SK Ulu Engkari
98
76
33
42













6
Delok
SK Ng Delok
196
142
21
121
7
Kaong
Tadika Kemas
382
280
63
217
8
Empit
SK Melaban
432
321
58
263
9
Kumpang
SK Ng Aup
155
108
24
84
10
Klampu
Rh Renggie Bukong
385
285
129
156
11
Sayat
SK Ng Kumpang
329
260
150 110
12
Kutai
SK Lubok Antu
627
474
134
340
13
Mepi
SK Batang Ai
437
319
72
247













14
Jela
Tadika Kemas
449
366
122
244
15
Sempang
Tadika Kemas
123
89
52 37
16
Bertik
Dewan SALCRA
196
157
47
107
17
Krangan Mong
Tadika Kemas
148
103
15
88
18
Ensawang
Dewan SALCRA
551
221
88
133
19
Kachong
SK Ng Menyebat
240
159
72
87
20
Patoh
Pej P'tanian Ng Patoh
133
90
25
65
21
Bilararap
SK Ulu Lemanak
198
133
66
67
22
Sepaya
SK Ng Tibu
293
239
45
194
23
Gugu
Rh Intang, Mengiling
292
207
147 59
24
Nenyang
SESCO Township
75
61
11
50
25
Lubok Antu
Pos
43




















TOTAL


8006
5719
1924
3790


MAJORITY








1866

Previous Election Results For Batang Ai

Results/Voters' voting patterns for Batang Ai based on last Parliamentary and DUN Elections for

P203 Lubok Antu (2008) & N.29 Batang Ai (2006)














P203 Lubok Antu


N.29 Batang Ai
S/No
Polling District
Polling Station
Votes
BN William
SNAP Nicholas
Votes BN Dublin SNAP Nicholas






Cast
Nyallau
Bawin
Cast
Unting Bawin
1
Sebangki
SK Sebangki
357
273
84
385
276 109
2
Lubok Antu
SMK Lubok Antu 1
253
150
103
254
162 92




SMK Lubok Antu 2
199
116
83
222
147 75
3
Sekarok
SK Sekarok
236
157
79
270
178 92
4
Kesit
SK Ng Kesit
348
197
151
275
149 126




SK Ng Kesit






224
132 92




Rh Umping
159
69
90




5
Engkari
SK Ulu Engkari
80
28
52
193
54 139




Rh Intang, Mengiling






83
1 82
6
Delok
SK Ng Delok
143
76
67
135
63 72
7
Kaong
Tadika Kemas
273
185
88
267
201 66
8
Empit
SK Melaban
300
206
94
307
247 60
9
Kumpang
SK Ng Aup
113
89
24
119
101 18
10
Klampu
Rh Renggie Bukong
264
142
122
278
136 142
11
Sayat
SK Ng Kumpang
248
125
123








Dewan S'guna






246
56 190
12
Kutai
SK Lubok Antu
435
317
118
456
314 142
13
Mepi
SK Batang Ai
320
217
103
274
143 131




SK Batang Ai






308
182 126
14
Jela
Tadika Kemas
361
66
295




15
Sempang
Tadika Kemas
96
35
61
228
49 179
16
Bertik
Dewan SALCRA
148
62
86
141
32 109
17
Krangan Mong
Tadika Kemas
101
86
15




18
Ensawang
Dewan SALCRA
377
229
148
375
294 81
19
Kachong
SK Ng Menyebat
176
61
115
181
77 104
20
Patoh
Pej P'tanian Ng Patoh 85
82
3
74
68 6
21
Bilararap
SK Ulu Lemanak
130
62
68
128
75 53
22
Sepaya
SK Ng Tibu
226
81
145
228
61 167
23
Gugu
Rh Intang, Mengiling
201
60
141




24
Nenyang
SESCO Township
61
46
15
77
58 19
25
Lubok Antu
Pos






56
39 17


















TOTAL


5690
3217
2473
5784
3295 2489


MAJORITY




744




806

Thursday, April 2, 2009

SKY's Open Letter To James Masing






From Hornbill Unleashed

April 2, 2009

An open letter to James Masing

Dear James,

You have been reported by the Borneo Post online (31.3.2009) as blaming Jawah Gerang for the lack of development in Batang Ai, because Jawah did not lobby for projects during his five terms as MP.

This sort of political narrative from a personal friend of 25 years astonishes me. Surely a person with such academic credential and long record in politics like you can say something more inspiring?

Development projects are a right to be enjoyed by tax payers, and not candies to be dangled by the ruling parties in any election to fish for votes.

Ibans are tax-payers too

The poor Ibans in Batang Ai may not pay much in income tax, because they are so poor in cash income. But for everything they buy, such as daily necessities, farm tools, fertilizers, fuel, machinery, construction materials, food, clothing, seeds, and everything they need, they pay the excise tax, sales tax, and the import tax already hidden in the retail price.

The only tax-free things they enjoy are the air they breathe. As tax-paying citizens, they have the basic human right to development in basic infrastructure.

Social Contract

Then there is the social contract. I do not mean the silly social contract that UMNO refers to. I mean the one proposed by Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau, whom you must have read in your pursuit of a Ph.D.

That contract is a theoretical construct, but its does offer the ground for the legitimacy of government.

There, a government is legitimate morally as long as it looks after the personal security, the prosperity, and the natural rights of citizens. When that government fails in its duty to the governed, then the people have the right to change the government – by a revolution even according to Locke.

Therefore, it is the duty of the federal and state government to provide basic development to the people of Batang Ai, even without the MP lobbying for it! That is what a government for the people, by the people, and of the people is supposed to do.

No money?

You may offer the lame excuse that Sarawak is too vast, with over 5000 villages spread in isolation. It is too expensive to provide basic infrastructure to all poor Sarawakians in the rural area.

How about the money generated from the timber wealth? How can that be channelled to the people rather than a few connected individuals? How about the profit generated by land use for plantation purposes? These are within the jurisdiction of the Sarawak state government after all.

How about the fantastic wealth generated by Sarawak’s indigenous oil and gas? Since you and your state government are so good at lobbying, why have you not lobbied for 20% royalty from the black gold beneath our feet?

Look at the West

In West Malaysia, electricity supply has reached 95% of the population. I think clean water and road access are about that figure. I do not like UMNO, but let’s give them credit for making some real change in rural Malaya. In the Klang Valley, the per capita income is something like RM 5000 per month! Lim Guan Eng has just announced that there are no longer cases of hard-core poverty in Penang State. Somehow, some of the money used in developing Malaya must have come from revenue from Sarawak oil and gas?

In contrast, 80% of the Ibans probably make less than RM 1000 per year.

Since you and your colleagues in the Sarawak BN are such effective lobbyists, can you please get some more funds from UMNO to eradicate poverty in Sarawak?

You and Sarawak BN have a powerful bargaining chip. You can threaten to withdraw support for the BN at the federal level, and help Pakatan Rakyat form the next federal government. After all, UMNO now depends on you guys to hold on to power in Putrajaya!

Many years ago, you told me in a private conversation that the Dayaks cannot be in the opposition. When I started in politics in 1978 in Bandar Kuching, many Chinese voters told me the same thing too.

This is where we disagree. The Dayaks can be in an opposition that can take power to become the government for the sake, not only of the Dayaks, but also for justice for all Sarawakians and all Malaysians.

I am now a private citizen and a pensioner. The Borneo Post would probably not print my letter. So I have to print it here, in cyberspace. I hope one of the readers will send it directly to you.

If you choose to reply, please send it to my email below. I promise you it will be published here in full and without censorship. Then we can have a frank debate between two fellow Anak Sarawak, just as we did about two decades ago in the media on the Bakun Dam.

Good health to you and your family,


Yours truly,

Sim Kwang Yang

(Kenyalang578@hotmail.com)


Batang Ai: Beware The Corrupt BN Bearing Gifts

Christmas has come early to Batang Ai, so much so that the people of other backward constituencies in Sarawak are wishing for the premature deaths of their own incumbents so that they can also enjoy the same "gifts".

In the case of Taib Mahmud, his death will not be premature, but long overdue and eagerly anticipated and awaited even by his own PBB party members and others of the corrupt BN. His deliberate failure to groom a successor will see a power struggle that will tear PBB and the state BN apart.

Anyway that is another story. For a list of all the goodies being bestowed upon the good folk of Batang Ai, see Anil Netto's account at "Batang Ai: Ho! Ho! Ho! The White-Haired One arrives..."

The fact that these goodies belong to the government and the people in the first place and not to BN is conveniently forgotten. The Elections Commission of course does not see these as corrupt practices or attempts to bribe the voters. And BN keeps on trying to justify them as part of "the continuing efforts of development" for the constituency, in spite of the obvious lack over the past 30 years.

Suddenly a critical by-election has brought forward all these "continuing efforts of development" into the space of hardly a month for Batang Ai and Christmas has come early, or so it would appear.

With so many past promises still unfulfilled, will these new promises be fulfilled or will the people of Batang Ai be fooled yet again?

The last 3 days of the by-election campaign period will be the most crucial, that is when the actual cash will arrive. Those voters who can't be bought by cash will be seduced by liquor and general festivities by the BN and they will wake up on election day to find that the voting is over. Or they may be transported away by BN for an all-expenses paid holiday to Kuching until after the voting. PKR should try to catch them in action and gather all the evidence. This will be important in the event an election petition becomes necessary, like in the case of Mong Dagang.

The pro-BN 3 monkeys, the Elections Commission, MACC and the 800+ police will of course as usual see nothing, hear nothing and say nothing.

PKR had better have enough fuel and transport (both land and river) ready to transport their voters who may not want be seen dead taking BN transport to their respective voting areas.

Keep a sharp eye on all goings-on during and even after the voting. Do not let your guard down at any time. When the voting ends, voting areas will be closed to all parties except the Elections Commission staff and hanky-panky can take place during the period before the counting begins. Make sure that only trusted members get to be polling and counting agents and they know exactly what to do and look out for - this is absolutely crucial.

The BN's trojan horses, of which there will be many, do not only come in the form of "gifts". They are masters of sabotage as well and they have the Elections Commission, MACC, the police and the whole government machinery on their side.

The only thing that can stop them is the WILL OF THE PEOPLE.

On second thoughts, welcome the corrupt BN bearing gifts.

Sarawak Headhunter's advice to the voters of Batang Ai is that if they want a better future for themselves and their children and grandchildren, TAKE WHATEVER THE BN GIVES AND VOTE FOR PKR.